Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Senator Snowe - The Canary in the Mineshaft of Politics.


Senator Snowe - The Canary in the Mineshaft of Politics. Senator Olympia Snowe's announcement that she will not run for re-election is a huge loss to the cause of rational thought and civility in the US Senate. As the Republican party continues to move farther and farther to the right it will become increasingly clear that all of us pay the price for this. That price comes in the form of continuing and growing cynicism among the American public and legislation and decisions that lack any basis in rational public policy. A strong two party system requires that both political parties be at least bound by a thread of rationality and civility and a commitment to the notion that the creation of public policy be the result of a healthy competition in the marketplace of ideas, not a mindless struggle between those who would have us create a nanny state and those who would burn down the system.

Monday, February 20, 2012

Posted to the Melissa Harris Perry Blog MSNBC

OK I admit it. I am totally enamored with MHP - as is my wife luckily - so it would take a lot to turn me away from watching on Saturday Morning. It is a moment of shear pleasure as I spend my only quality time of the week on my art and listen and watch MHP. But I have to say that either MHP was completely broadsided by Richard Nixon’s son-in-law or she made a novice’s mistake of inviting a piker to a gathering of wonks. Someone had to have thought that this guy had the intellectual juice to discuss a very serious issue - I had a feeling that MHP was mortified to then have him waste everyone’s time regurgitating the GOP talking points. He should have been dismissed after the first break and when MHP came back on she should have explained that on her show there was an expectation that guests use their brains and not just repeat someone else’s weekly talking points. Furthermore, the first time a Democrat does the same thing he/she too should be banished.

I come from Republican stock, though I am an independent Democrat who almost always splits his ticket on election day. MHP had scheduled a very worthwhile discussion about what has happened to the Republican party. How did it go from the party of Lincoln to the party of Stink’n. That kind of discussion requires serious minded people who aren’t going to give a pass to idiots and ideologues.

As someone who watches news during most of my brief television time I had really hoped that when Jon Stewart took down Firing Line that at least some of the political commentators would give some thought to programming that would enlighten us by sharing nuance and intellect. Unfortunately not many folks have been able to do that. MSNBC at least has a majority of the good ones and to me the Gold standard for MHP has to be the fellow who comes on just before her. Chris Hayes doesn’t hide his own opinions, he doesn’t have to, but what he does is to give respect to the opposition and invite the discussion of deeper meaning, philosophy and- above all - nuance. Most of us would rather watch a professor or an historian than a politician anyway but still I have to believe that there are plenty of politicians who will rise to the occasion if they know that an honest discussion will not put them at a disadvantage to some ideologue who came into the studio dragging his or her knuckles across the floor. (no insult intended to chimps or monkeys who can’t help it.)

I’ll love you no matter what MHP but please have a sit down with your schedulers and staff. Tell them that all they need to do is ask themselves if the “considered guest” deserves to rub elbows with a woman of your intellect. If the answer is no then let them go somewhere else. Give us brain food - people of all persuasions who haven’t read a talking points memo and would laugh (or scoff) if they did. I promise you, if people watch your show and come away with ideas for moving the country forward - for bridging the ideological divide - you will begin to create a currency for honorable dialog, agreement and disagreement that will pay huge dividends in the long run for you and our beloved country. March on Sister! Wayne King Former NH Senator and 1994 Dem nominee for Gov in NH.

http://truth-passion-hope-dreams.tumblr.com

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Wikileaks and the Pro-Democracy Movement in the Middle East

One cannot help but take note of the fact that the unrest in the middle east that is geared toward democracy is taking place following some substantial revelations about the very countries that are experiencing unrest.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

State of the Union - The Sky Brightens

A State of the Union Address is not - as a rule - a time for details and nuance. Nor should one expect the response to contain a lot of substance. Rather they are an opportunity to present a vision of the days ahead to the American people. When they “sing” it is because they have been well crafted and they speak to the issues that matter to us.

By that measure both the President’s address and the Republican response were right on the mark. Not because I agreed with everything that either President Obama or Represnetative Paul Ryan said but because they presented their visions clearly and well to the people - elevating the dialog and engaging with one another.

Over the next few days I will blog my observations about the details of the statements – and there is much to be said. For now, let it be said that there is every reason to believe that the price paid by the fallen in Tuscon was not in vain and that their sacrifice may have lighted a candle whose luminance has shown us a path by which we may begin to emerge from an accursed darkness

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Ben Franklin's Prescription for Today's Congressional Gridlock

Sometimes the briefest speeches echo the most powerfully down through our history. As it has been with Lincoln's address at Gettysburg; such it is with the words of Benjamin Franklin at the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

Franklin, frail and unable to deliver the speech himself , asked his friend and fellow Pennsylvanian James Wilson to read the speech for him. It is a speech that every member of Congress should be required to read at the start of each annual Congressional Session for Franklin reminds us - in the wisdom of his age - that our obligations to our country must be larger than our egos.

Here in less than 720 words is a prescription for what ails the United States Congress.

I confess that there are several parts of this constitution which I do not at present approve, but I am not sure I shall never approve them: For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged by better information, or fuller consideration, to change opinions even on important subjects, which I once thought right, but found to be otherwise. It is therefore that the older I grow, the more apt I am to doubt my own judgment, and to pay more respect to the judgment of others. Most men indeed as well as most sects in Religion, think themselves in possession of all truth, and that wherever others differ from them it is so far error. Steele a Protestant in a Dedication tells the Pope, that the only difference between our Churches in their opinions of the certainty of their doctrines is, the Church of Rome is infallible and the Church of England is never in the wrong. But though many private persons think almost as highly of their own infallibility as of that of their sect, few express it so naturally as a certain french lady, who in a dispute with her sister, said "I don't know how it happens, Sister but I meet with no body but myself, that's always in the right — Il n'y a que moi qui a toujours raison."

In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of Government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other. I doubt too whether any other Convention we can obtain, may be able to make a better Constitution. For when you assemble a number of men to have the advantage of their joint wisdom, you inevitably assemble with those men, all their prejudices, their passions, their errors of opinion, their local interests, and their selfish views. From such an assembly can a perfect production be expected? It therefore astonishes me, Sir, to find this system approaching so near to perfection as it does; and I think it will astonish our enemies, who are waiting with confidence to hear that our councils are confounded like those of the Builders of Babel; and that our States are on the point of separation, only to meet hereafter for the purpose of cutting one another's throats.

Thus I consent, Sir, to this Constitution because I expect no better, and because I am not sure, that it is not the best. The opinions I have had of its errors, I sacrifice to the public good. I have never whispered a syllable of them abroad. Within these walls they were born, and here they shall die. If every one of us in returning to our Constituents were to report the objections he has had to it, and endeavor to gain partizans in support of them, we might prevent its being generally received, and thereby lose all the salutary effects & great advantages resulting naturally in our favor among foreign Nations as well as among ourselves, from our real or apparent unanimity. Much of the strength & efficiency of any Government in procuring and securing happiness to the people, depends, on opinion, on the general opinion of the goodness of the Government, as well as of the wisdom and integrity of its Governors. I hope therefore that for our own sakes as a part of the people, and for the sake of posterity, we shall act heartily and unanimously in recommending this Constitution (if approved by Congress & confirmed by the Conventions) wherever our influence may extend, and turn our future thoughts & endeavors to the means of having it well administered.

On the whole, Sir, I can not help expressing a wish that every member of the Convention who may still have objections to it, would with me, on this occasion doubt a little of his own infallibility, and to make manifest our unanimity, put his name to this instrument.

The Metamorphosis

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

"Imagine if the Tea Party Was Black" - Tim Wise

A very thought provoking and provocative piece here.

Let’s play a game, shall we? The name of the game is called “Imagine.” The way it’s played is simple: we’ll envision recent happenings in the news, but then change them up a bit. Instead of envisioning white people as the main actors in the scenes we’ll conjure - the ones who are driving the action - we’ll envision black folks or other people of color instead. The object of the game is to imagine the public reaction to the events or incidents, if the main actors were of color, rather than white. Whoever gains the most insight into the workings of race in America, at the end of the game, wins.

More

Thursday, April 8, 2010

O'Dowd Comes Out Swinging Against Corruption within Church

"I am a Catholic down to my DNA. I will always be a Catholic. I will not surrender my church to the corruption that infects the hierarchy and corrodes the Church from within. It's time not only for regime change--although Benedict surely must go--but also for a thorough redesign of church governance and elimination of traditions and policies that have long since outlived their usefulness." Maureen O'Dowd

Read the piece in the Times.

Launch at the Dells



Available for sale only through Conservation Artists - Click here.

Green News